US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Seale v. United States of America
as 5:2024mc00006
Petitioner:
Justin Seale
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Seale v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE NO. 5:24-MC-6-D
as 5:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Justin Seale
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Tonya Joyner Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, David A. Hubbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Dexter J. Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, David A. Hubbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rawat, et al. v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00779
Petitioner:
Dawood Ajum Rawat and Ayesha Hassam Rawat
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Webb-Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charlotte K. Webb-Smith
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Brown v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michele Brown
Defendant:
United States of America, et al
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Bandawat et al v. United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2008cv00422
Petitioner:
Steven J. Bandawat and Patricia Bandawat
Respondent:
United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Multi-State Contract, et al v. The Commissioner of
as 5:2005cv00055
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
