US District Court for the District of South Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Auray et al v. Delivery by Delivery Inc et al
as 6:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Robert Auray, Jr and Marion Auray
Defendant:
Delivery by Delivery Inc and SGT Auto Transport Corp
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
United Van Lines LLC v. Tocco
as 4:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines LLC
Defendant:
Natalie Tocco
Judge v. IC System Inc
as 2:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
Rashad Judge
Defendant:
IC System Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Khalili et al v. Lally-Ries LLC
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Meena Khalili and Brent Dedas
Defendant:
Lally-Ries LLC doing business as Two Men and a Truck
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
CSX Transportation Inc v. American Gypsum Company LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04011
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
AG South Carolina LLC and American Gypsum Company LLC
Coker v. Coastal Carrier Moving and Storage Grand Strand, Inc
as 4:2020cv01942
Defendant:
Coastal Carrier Moving and Storage Grand Strand, Inc
Plaintiff:
Brad Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. LT Claims & Restoration Services LT et al
as 4:2019cv02728
Defendant:
LT Transit Claims Service Inc, Allied Van, LT Claims & Restoration Services LT and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Mitchell
Mitchell v. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc
as 4:2019cv01939
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Mitchell
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Meyer v. McMaster et al
as 3:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Mark Hammond, Henry McMaster and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Austin Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitsui Sumitomo Ins Co Ltd v. Estes Express Lines
as 2:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Ins Co Ltd
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
