US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,823
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elyas v. Shepherd, et al
as 1:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Sameer Mohamed Elyas, Gary Shepherd and V. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Larry Edwin Patterson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Terrance C. Coles, Patricia West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Antoine Mandrell Branch
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. Department Of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
George A. Cooke
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Pamunkey Regional Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Maynard
Defendant:
Pamunkey Regional Jail, Willett, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Stoy et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stoy, Williams, Officer Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Charles v. Loudoun Times-Mirror et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Defendant:
Loudoun Times-Mirror, Ogden Newspapers and Evan Goodenow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Holloway
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
