Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 13,334
Downing v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Downing
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Sean Caughron and W.R. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Graves
Defendant:
J.R. Adams, Sgt. J. Grubb and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senter v. Haysi Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Alexander Senter
Defendant:
Haysi Regional Jail and Duffield Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Virginia Parole Board
as 7:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Barksdale
Defendant:
Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffelt v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay Coffelt
Defendant:
Rick White, Holmes and Principle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Brian Terelle Richardson
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Sgt. Dyer and C.O. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cory Adam Martin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bailey, Williams and Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
