US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,920
Maloney v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Robert Maloney
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Swiger v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Swiger
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hannah v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lasale Hannah
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Judge Waters and Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carter-EL v. Ray et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
George E. Carter-EL
Respondent:
H.L. Ray and Mr. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Terry L. Adams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
