West Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,028
Cunningham et al v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Arnette Cunningham and Madelyn Ruth Cunningham
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moran v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Crystal Moran
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Skidmore v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James M. Skidmore
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hylton v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hylton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Blake
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ward v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Ward
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Holley Ann Bradshaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Efaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Efaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dee Dee Dallas Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Downey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Connie Ladonna Downey
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
