Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 43,398
Yarbrough v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00355
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arce v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00162
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. The Houston Police Department
as 4:2015cv01391
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charlton Tipton v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50444
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLTON REED TIPTON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Constance v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00329
Respondent: N. Burl Cain, James Caldwell
Petitioner: David Constance
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whittle v. Stephens
as 3:2015cv01783
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Andrus v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20285
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES R. ANDRUS
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10457
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Demarcus Jones v. T. Werlich, Warden
as 15-30460
Petitioner - Appellant: DEMARCUS LACARL JONES
Respondent - Appellee: T. G. WERLICH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Calvin Goolsbee v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20283
Petitioner - Appellant: CALVIN GOOLSBEE
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.