Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 66,509
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Mahoney
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Keep Separate Inmate Assailants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Ricardo v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Sanchez-Ricardo
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Licon v. Sheriff of Ector County
as 7:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Licon
Respondent:
Sheriff of Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Eric Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
