Fifth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 27,409
Bartek v. Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC
as 4:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Stuart Bartek
Defendant:
Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC doing business as Retina Consultants of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Matlock et al v. RCI Dining Services (Sulphur), Inc. D/B/A Scarlett's Cabaret et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Holly Matlock and Detyscha Pickney
Defendant:
RCI Dining Services (Sulphur), Inc. D/B/A Scarlett's Cabaret, Cordero Pennington and Travis R. Reese
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thompson v. Murari Pharmacy LLC
as 3:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Yvette Thompson
Defendant:
Murari Pharmacy LLC
Porter v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Laura Porter
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Palova v. United Airlines
as 24-20136
Plaintiff:
Anna Palova
Defendant:
United Airlines, Incorporated
Rose v. Grappler Pressure Pumping
as 24-50251
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rose, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Derrick Boyd, Roberto Castaneda and others
Defendant:
Grappler Pressure Pumping, L.L.C.
Lee et al v. R&R Home Care, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Douglas A Lee, II and Ashlynn Estay
Defendant:
R&R Home Care, Inc., Medical Brokers Management, Inc. and Jay Weil, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Keen v. Onpoint Industrial Services
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mandy Keen
Defendant:
Onpoint Industrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Heavenly Haven Care Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Phil Scott
Defendant:
Heavenly Haven Care Services, Inc.
Spinosa v. FWVape Bros, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kevin Spinosa
Defendant:
FWVape Bros, LLC, Waleed Zafar and Fahad Zafar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1554 Federal Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
