US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Simpson County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Simpson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Simpson County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and L. J. Camper
Defendant:
Simpson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Simpson County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Simpson County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams County Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Adams County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Jacqueline Marsaw
Defendant:
Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Adams County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Adams County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amite County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Amite County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Amite County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Glenn Wilson
Defendant:
Amite County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors, Amite County, Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, Amite County, Mississippi Republican Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Wayne County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Wayne County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Leah Parson
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Nanette Thurmond-Smith
Defendant:
Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Copiah County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Copiah County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. Pike County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee and Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP
Defendant:
Pike County, Mississippi Board Of Supervisors , Pike County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee, Pike County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Madison County Board of Supervisors et al v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Madison County Board of Supervisors and John W. Robinson , III
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI , Lee Westbrook , Madison County Republican Executive Committee and others
Movant:
City of Madison, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hancock County Board of Supervisors v. Ruhr et al
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Hancock County Board of Supervisors
Defendant:
Karen Ladner Ruhr, Hancock County Republican Executive Committee and Hancock County Democratic Executive Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Personhood Mississippi et al v. Hood et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Personhood Mississippi and P. Leslie Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Delbert Hosemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Hosemann
as 2:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Thomas, Carl Bibeau, Teresa Bibeau and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
