US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,445
Thomas v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Lisa Thomas
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Prudential Insurance Agency LLC
as 3:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Forrest General Hospital
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sharon Williams
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arthur v. Empire Ridgeland LLC
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arthur
Defendant:
Empire Ridgeland LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Killian v. Tom's King LLC
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tiki M. Killian
Defendant:
Tom's King LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becks v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Erika Becks
Defendant:
Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. and Cairo Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Speights v. City of Lumberton, Mississippi
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Betty Speights
Defendant:
City of Lumberton, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carey v. Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
as 3:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joy Carey
Defendant:
Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tillis v. Town of Anguilla et al
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tillis
Defendant:
Town of Anguilla and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
