Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 138
The Mississippi Bar v. Brooks
as 3:2023ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Brandon LaRue Brooks
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Rocha et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Victor Rocha, Roy Jakobs, Royal Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Hammett
as 3:2023ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Mary Holly Hammett
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Lumumba et al v. Bey
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Chokwe Lumumba, Chief James Davis, Judge Henry Clay and others
Defendant:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Granite Re, Inc. v. Trans4Fed, LLC
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Granite Re, Inc.
Defendant:
Trans4Fed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2022ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Latisha R. Smith
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Boone et al v. Bey
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Steven Boone, William Purdie, Phil Fisher and others
Defendant:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 1:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 3:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
