Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,908
Thomas v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Lisa Thomas
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Prudential Insurance Agency LLC
as 3:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Su v. Battle Fish North et al
as 3:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Battle Fish North, Magnolia Processing, Inc., William Houston Battle, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Forrest General Hospital
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sharon Williams
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arthur v. Empire Ridgeland LLC
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arthur
Defendant:
Empire Ridgeland LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sitton v. Shack Up Inn, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Torey Sitton
Defendant:
Shack Up Inn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson v. Medline Industries, LP
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Marquita Johnson
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patel et al v. Jay Mataji, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Patel and Mittal Patel
Defendant:
Jay Mataji, Inc., Atul Patel, Amit Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Killian v. Tom's King LLC
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tiki M. Killian
Defendant:
Tom's King LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
