US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,944
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent:
Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Eric Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John v. Grant et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Aaron Blake Wood
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morales v. Dawson County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Josue Morales
Respondent:
Dawson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
