Texas Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 178
DeZan et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00054
Petitioner:
Arel Group Wine & Spirits, Inc. and Armando DeZan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
In re: 0243 MEDICAL, LLC et al v. United States
as 4:2017mc00022
Plaintiff:
0243 MEDICAL, LLC and Roger Leaton
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Carmona v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Hector R. Carmona, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Carmona v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Hector R. Carmona, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Davidson v. United States of Amercia
as 4:2017cv01554
Petitioner:
Kenneth Davidson
Third_party_defendant:
United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Gilliam et al v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Lance Gilliam and Gilliam Jennifer
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Arismendy v. The United States et al
as 4:2017cv01139
Petitioner:
Kelly Ann Arismendy
Respondent:
The United States, Internal Revenue Commissioner, Miguel A Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Rodriguez
as 4:2017cv01117
Petitioner:
Mynor Eduardo Rodriguez and Mynor Law Office of Mynor E. Rodriguez P.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Arismendy v. The United States et al
as 4:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Arismendy
Defendant:
The United States, Internal Revenue Commissioner, Miguel A Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Jimmie O. Clements v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2017mc00111
Movant:
Jimmie O. Clements
Respondent:
Michael L. Hervey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
