Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,509
Cevallos Sarzosa v. Vergara Enriquez
as 3:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Allan Andres Cevallos Sarzosa
Respondent:
Cryster Dennisse Vergara Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 ICARA
Howze v. VIGHTER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
as 5:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ronicia Howze
Defendant:
VIGHTER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2024mc00490
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Daniel Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Saleh v. Spruce Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Crystal Saleh
Defendant:
Spruce Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Menon
as 4:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Marsa Robinson
Defendant:
Manoj Menon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Florence v. Office of the Attorney General
as 4:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Ladell Florence
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General, Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.
as 2:2024mc00005
Petitioner:
Tyson Foods Inc
Respondent:
Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.
Herrera et al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Amaurice Herrera and Angela Herrera
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lazos et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lazos and Yesnia Uribe
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC v. Regan
as 4:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
