District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 58,605
Morrison v. Stephens
as 7:2015cv00069
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Jared Morrison
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2015cv01721
Plaintiff: Michael Watts
Defendant: Southern Health Partners, Dr. Mongare
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson et al
as 2:2015cv00157
Plaintiff: Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant: J Anderson, Raymond C Pickard, Terry D Rains and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff: Dagoberto Lira Moreno
Defendant: GEO Group Inc, Taylor Baxter, Medical Department Director and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01724
Petitioner: Roosevelt Hollins
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jolley v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv01348
Plaintiff: Lawyer Jolley
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Phillips et al
as 4:2015cv01341
Plaintiff: Fidel Davis
Defendant: C Phillips, Jeff Cafe, Larry Gist and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynn v. Doe
as 7:2015cv00086
Plaintiff: Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena-Gonzalez v. BOP et al
as 6:2015cv00036
Petitioner: Ruben Pena-Gonzalez
Respondent: BOP, Correction Corporation of America, Trinity Service Comer Staff
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Demus v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01723
Petitioner: Kendrick Bernard Demus
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.