Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 39,648
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harp v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Levi Harp
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. District Attorney of Edwards County
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
John A. Contreras
Defendant:
District Attorney of Edwards County and Judge of the 452nd District of Edwards County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Kopatz v. John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Kopatz
Defendant:
John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit, John Doe, UCC-Telford Unit, Brandy Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deary v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deary
Defendant:
B. Collier, B. Reitsma, T. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Glen Lee Hayward
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Sargeant T. Pickins and Detention Officer N. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
