US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,504
Baker v. Blane et al
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Defendant:
Eve Blane, Norma Lay, Leamon Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flintroy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lamar Flintroy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fugate v. Shelby County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
William L. Fugate
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Center, Shelby County Detention Medical Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Mattox
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Damrell v. Richmond PD et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Derick Damrell
Defendant:
Richmond PD, Richmond Sheriffs Department and Madison County DPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Ward
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES and KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
