US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,931
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Bullit Co CHFS et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Allen Smith
Defendant:
Bullit Co CHFS and Commonwealth Cabinet for Health and Family Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noe v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ian Noe
Defendant:
Jordan Kennedy and City of Russellville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. Life Storage Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
Life Storage Inc. and Extra Space Storage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pawley v. Meinhart
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Andrue Pawley
Defendant:
Carol B. Meinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
