District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 826
Smilebond Systems LLC v. GC America Inc.
as 2:2015cv11862
Plaintiff: Smilebond Systems LLC
Defendant: GC America Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Murphy Oil USA, INC.,
as 2:2015cv11525
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant: Murphy Oil USA, INC.
Radius Garden LLC v. Glorious Outdoors LLC
as 2:2015cv11431
Plaintiff: Radius Garden LLC
Defendant: Glorious Outdoors LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
AMI Hose, LLC v. Hydra-Quip, Int'l, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff: AMI Hose, LLC
Defendant: Hydra-Quip, Int'l, LLC , Norman Martucci
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Jay & Kay Manufacturing, LLC v. Xtreme Tower Products
as 2:2015cv11341
Plaintiff: Jay & Kay Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant: Xtreme Tower Products
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Andronaco, Inc. et al v. Kerotest Manufacturing Corp.
as 1:2015cv00380
Plaintiff: Andronaco, Inc. , Polyvalve, LLC
Defendant: Kerotest Manufacturing Corp.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
CTP Innovations, LLC v. Grandville Printing Co.
as 1:2015cv00373
Plaintiff: CTP Innovations, LLC
Defendant: Grandville Printing Co.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
T-Rex Property AB v. Disselkoen Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00328
Plaintiff: T-Rex Property AB
Defendant: Disselkoen Properties, Inc. , Big D's Leasing LLC , Randy Disselkoen Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
SignComp, LLC v. Wagner Zip-Change, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00304
Plaintiff: SignComp, LLC
Defendant: Wagner Zip-Change, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Intellectual Wellness LLC v. GenX Labs
as 2:2015cv10955
Plaintiff: Intellectual Wellness LLC
Defendant: GenX Labs
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.