US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,215
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malvasi v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Filing Error
as 5:2024cv00416
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bugno v. Hunsinger
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Alex Bugno
Respondent:
Warden Angela Hunsinger-Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Taquashone Ray
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. Bracy
as 3:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Angelo Bobby Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Charmain Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
