US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,908
Chams v. Sibcy Cline, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
James Chams
Defendant:
Sibcy Cline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Gentry et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Desmond Gentry and Pour LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Benson v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lynette Benson
Defendant:
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00074
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00077
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Misner v. Empire Auto Protect, LLC
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Brady Misner
Defendant:
Empire Auto Protect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baker v. Line Financial, PBC
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Paula Baker
Defendant:
Line Financial, PBC doing business as Beem
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
