US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,696
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Ronald B Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manning v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Major Kyle Manning
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yuengel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Shelly A Yuengel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnstone v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Johnstone L Dennis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Darlene Brooks
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HEASTON et al v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ESTHER HEASTON and BILL HEASTON
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wambles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Charlie Wambles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Neil Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holloway v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Terrence Holloway
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Konradt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Michael Konradt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.