US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,390
GEP Administrative Services, LLC v. Wiseman
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
GEP Administrative Services, LLC doing business as Entertainment Partners
Defendant:
Melissa Wiseman
Doe (WEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawit v. Meharry Medical College
as 3:2020cv00624
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Landis v. Greyson et al
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Barry Landis
Defendant:
Ash Greyson, Jason Brown, Robert Taylor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Littman et al v. United States Department Labor et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Margaret Littman and Jennifer Chesak
Defendant:
United States Department Labor, Julie Su, Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Respondent:
Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
C.A.T. Global Inc. v. Honeybee Transporation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
C.A.T. Global Inc.
Defendant:
Honeybee Transporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 The Carmack Amendment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
