U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 988
Travis Huss v. Time Warner Inc. Corporate Office & Headquarters
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS DUANE HUSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TIME WARNER INC. CORPORATE OFFICE & HEADQUARTERS
Dika-Homewood L.L.C. v. Office Max, Incorporated
as 23-1914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIKA-HOMEWOOD L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE MAX, INCORPORATED
Michael Leit v. Aspirus Medical Group, Inc.
as 23-1861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEIT
Defendant / Appellee:
ASPIRUS MEDICAL GROUP, INC., doing business as ASPIRUS CLINICS, INC.
NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Company Inc., et al
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NHC LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTAUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC., an Illinois corporation, SPIRO TSAPARAS and PETER ALEXOPOULOS
Monte Merz v. Scott Kindybalyk
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTE N. MERZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT E. KINDYBALYK, also known as Scott Kindy
Aileen Ormsby, et al v. Nexus RVs, LLC, et al
as 23-1712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AILEEN ORMSBY, GEORGE ORMSBY and TWO J'S ENTERPRISES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
NEXUS RVS, LLC and DAVID LINT
Monte Merz v. Scott Kindybalyk
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTE N. MERZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT E. KINDYBALYK, also known as Scott Kindy
Jerico Cruz v. Upstart Network, Inc.
as 23-1587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERICO MATIAS CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UPSTART NETWORK, INC.
Charles Hess, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES HESS, MARTY HIGGINS, ROBERT MCCORMICK, also known as GLEN MCCORMICK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BIOMET, INC. and ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.
Charles Hess, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
as 23-1556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HESS, MARTY HIGGINS, ROBERT MCCORMICK, also known as GLEN MCCORMICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BIOMET, INC. and ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
