Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26,072
Abt, Gary v. Johnson, D. et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Abt
Defendant:
D. Johnson, Jenna L. Parks and Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03239
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Hart et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
C/O Hart, C/O Bent, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young, Howard v. Beavais, Chad et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Young, Ebboni Young and Ebboni Howard Young
Defendant:
Lt. Chad Beavais, Lt. Paul Rosenthal, Lt. Eric Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tekuarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinikin, Jeremiah v. Tank
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah N. Kinikin
Defendant:
C.O. Tank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
