Illinois Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 40,893
RSS Feed | View as table
Rabtsevich et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv02815
Plaintiff: DZINA RABTSEVICH, ANDREI RABTSEVICH, VALERIYA RABTSEVICH and others
Defendant: Aledandro Mayorkas, District Director UR M JADDOU and TED H. KIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. v. Nirav Express 1, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02747
Plaintiff: Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc.
Defendant: Nirav Express 1, Inc. doing business as Nirav Express Fresh Market, Nirav Indian Groceries & Spices, Inc., Manish Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Banas v. WLCC Lending FDL et al
as 1:2024cv02770
Defendant: Raycen Raines, III, WLCC Lending FDL doing business as Fast Day Loans, Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Banas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DWM International, Inc v. Cristaux, Inc
as 1:2024cv02758
Plaintiff: DWM International, Inc
Defendant: Cristaux, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02754
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Doe v. Stevenson
as 1:2024cv02778
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: Nathaniel Stevenson
Garza v. Barbier et al
as 1:2024cv02725
Plaintiff: Jose Garza
Defendant: Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, Richard J. Barry and others
Giamanco v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02694
Plaintiff: Joseph Giamanco
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02651
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02692
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?