US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 253
United States of America v. Cloudy
as 2:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith M Cloudy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. Pompy
as 2:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcus Pompy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. Cook
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Devon Byron Cook
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. Wright
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ciontay Wright
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
Dong v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
He Song Dong
Defendant:
United States of America and Drug Enforcement Administration
United States of America v. Royster
as 2:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Howard Gerald Royster
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. $15,100.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$15,100.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Brown
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clarence Brown
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture
United States of America v. $139,054.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$139,054.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Gaddy
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Craig Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
