Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases

Health Insurance Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PETRUCCI v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00776
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: KAREN PETRUCCI
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
MCINTOSH v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00171
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff: MYRTLE MCINTOSH
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
KNOLLMAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN.
as 1:2013cv01443
Plaintiff: CLARE KNOLLMAN
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00161
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: DEENA THORNTON
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
CARROLL v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00582
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY D. CARROLL
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
MIDDLETOWN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv00579
Plaintiff: MIDDLETOWN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
KASTNER v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00186
Plaintiff: CHARLES KASTNER
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
MCDERMOTT v. LEAVITT
as 1:2006cv01327
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
THOMANN v. BARNHART
as 2:2005cv00287
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
LONG v. BARNHART
as 2:2004cv00317
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.