US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,833
Roehrman v. Leadsmarket.com et al
as 1:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roehrman
Defendant:
Leadsmarket.com, Marketing Labs, LLC and Nesmetaju, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
G&G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. PITTMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
G&G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC
Defendant:
Lynn A. Pittman and PILOT PURSUIT LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ROLLER v. EXCENTUS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ROLLER
Defendant:
EXCENTUS CORPORATION and VIBES MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Karel Farahan, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham Farahan
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Farahan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
