Indiana Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 105
1st Source Bank v. Lynch
as 3:2018cv00776
Defendant:
Randall Lynch and Randall W Lynch
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Countryside Bank v. Naseer et al
as 2:2018cv00347
Defendant:
Bushra Naseer, M.R. Allah LLC, Zafar Sheikh and others
Plaintiff:
Countryside Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust v. Remijas
as 2:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust
Defendant:
Richard Remijas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Source Bank v. A-W Bennett Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
A-W Bennett Enterprises, Inc. and Paul Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Source Bank v. 4A Equipment LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
4A Equipment LLC, Alan Otto, Otto Trucking Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Source Bank v. Johnston et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Carl Johnston and Minnie Moore Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONTRAGER v. AIRSIGN, INC.
as 1:2018cv00354
Defendant:
AIRSIGN, INC.
Plaintiff:
JASON BONTRAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN v. THE PEOPLES STATE BANK
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
THE PEOPLES STATE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Centier Bank v. Indiana Whiskey Company The et al
as 3:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Centier Bank
Defendant:
Indiana Whiskey Company The and Charles W Florance , III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. v. LANKARANI et al
as 1:2017cv03588
Plaintiff:
NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
Reza Lankarani and Farah Pakseresht
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
