Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 222
CAUFIELD v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. CAUFIELD
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Crayton v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 2:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Charles Crayton and Charles A Crayton
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
BARBARA C. WILLIAMS and BRIAN P. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
JAMES v. INDIANA HARBOR BELT et al
as 1:2019cv03226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. and INDIANA HARBOR BELT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TRUPPO v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2019cv01953
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TRUPPO
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CARSTENSEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01731
Plaintiff:
VERA CARSTENSEN and BARRY MORRIS CARSTENSEN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Thomas v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Douglas L Thomas
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Machuca v. Wisconsin Central Ltd
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd. and Wisconsin Central Ltd
Plaintiff:
Deric Machuca
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Boyn et al v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2019cv00023
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation and Gary Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Gary D Boyn and Melissa Serna
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BROWN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
as 1:2019cv00043
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
