District Court Cases in Indiana

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 111,433
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner: TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent: JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TINDALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00549
Petitioner: GARY TINDALL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FENI et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff: CASEY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant: A. FENI, AKENADI, UNKNOWN OFFICER (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Hawk v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant: Indiana State of, Kosciusko County and Kosciusko County Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. South Bend Housing Authority
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant: South Bend Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent: Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lairson v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Eric Lairson
Defendant: Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?