US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,238
Brown v. Unknown Officers et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Elliot H Brown
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, CO Cornhog and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Ladarius D McGhee
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. City of Milwaukee
as 2:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Johnnie B Rose
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Will v. Silva
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jacob Will
Defendant:
Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clincy v. Carr
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta S Clincy
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Smathers et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joseph Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Alexandra Kathleen Smathers, Xavier Solis and Gerad Dougvidlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath v. Kincaid
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee McElrath
Defendant:
Kelly Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Market et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Terrell Harris
Defendant:
Officer Market, Officer Shoup and Milwaukee Police Department District 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alnabulsi v. Mount Pleasant Police Department
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alnabulsi and Mohammad Tarek Alnabulsi
Defendant:
Mount Pleasant Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alnabulsi v. Racine Police Department
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alnabulsi and Mohammad Tarek Alnabulsi
Defendant:
Racine Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
