US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Cieslicki, Andre v. Soo Line Railroad
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Andre Cieslicki
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tschudy, Jacob v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tschudy
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moore, Howard et al v. Charter Communications, LLC
as 3:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Howard J. Moore, Erik Jensen, Matthew Hobbs and others
Defendant:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins, Rosemary v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Collins
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
United States of America v. Affordable Exteriors LLC
as 3:2020cv00983
Defendant:
Affordable Exteriors LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Ryder, Benjamin v. Conagra Brands, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00557
Defendant:
Conagra Brands, Inc. and ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Ryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koch, Mary v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00396
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Koch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brown, Corey v. Choice Products USA, LLC
as 3:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Choice Products USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Corey P. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahrens, Russell v. Local 643 Transit, AFSCME AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Terry Williams, AFSCME, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Local 643 Transit, AFSCME AFL-CIO
Plaintiff:
Russell Ahrens
United States of America v. Dann & Wendt, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Dann & Wendt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
