Wisconsin Torts - Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 679
Flores v. American Family Insurance et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
American Family Insurance, Matt Adams, Pat Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Tesky, Kal v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kal Tesky
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Olmstead v. 90 Degree Benefits - Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jenny Olmstead
Defendant:
90 Degree Benefits - Wisconsin, f/k/a EBSO, Inc., 90 Degree Benefits, LLC, 90 Degree Benefits - Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Huss, Travis v. Nvidia Corporation
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Travis Duane Huss
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dougherty v. Kohls Inc
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Dougherty
Defendant:
Kohl's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Huss v. Expert Automotive Services LLC
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Travis Duane Huss
Defendant:
Expert Automotive Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Ollerman, Kenneth v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ollerman
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dizard v. EIN CAP Inc
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Seth E Dizard
Defendant:
EIN CAP Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Murray v. OneTouchPoint, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Liam Murray
Defendant:
OneTouchPoint Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Asphalt Contractors Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
Asphalt Contractors Inc and SECURA Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
