US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,999
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooks v. Reese et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Shayla Hooks doing business as Hooks Construction LLC
Defendant:
Ward Reese and Mary Beth Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ortiz
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, Henry Topps, Joshua Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burns v. Calaway et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brandon Burns
Defendant:
Sean Calaway, Charles Fears and Marty Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Isaac v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Isaac
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Patton et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
