US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,731
Johnson et al v. Patel et al
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff: Janice Oakley Johnson, Alfonzo Johnson and Fred Oakley
Defendant: Darivyak Patel and Hitesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05058
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv03032
Plaintiff: Aiden Jones
Defendant: Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff: Aiden Jones
Defendant: Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Eli Hobbs, et al
as 5:2024cv05057
Plaintiff: Damon Charles Sanford
Defendant: Eli Hobbs, Brad Robinson and Washington County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05055
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05047
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?