US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Mears v. Tyson Poultry, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
David Mears
Defendant:
Tyson Poultry, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Coble v. SOHDental, LLC
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Misty Coble
Defendant:
Sohdental, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Peterman v. Manhattan Road & Bridge Company
as 6:2023cv06144
Plaintiff:
John Peterman
Defendant:
Manhattan Road & Bridge Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Prinsen et al v. Domtar Paper Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv04076
Plaintiff:
Bryan Prinsen and Daniel Oden
Defendant:
Domtar Paper Company, LLC and Domtar A.W., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Donohue v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv05056
Plaintiff:
Ryan Donohue
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Cavner v. University of Arkansas Fort Smith et al
as 2:2021cv02034
Defendant:
Mercy Hospital Fort Smith and University of Arkansas Fort Smith
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jackie Cavner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Covey v. National Park College
as 6:2020cv06141
Plaintiff:
Alana Covey
Defendant:
National Park College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Huynh v. Exide Technologies et al
as 2:2020cv02163
Defendant:
Exide Technologies and Trisha Feely
Plaintiff:
Abraham Huynh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stripling v. University of Arkansas et al
as 5:2018cv05148
Plaintiff:
Sara Stripling
Defendant:
University of Arkansas, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture and University of Arkansas doing business as Division of Argiculture Research and Extension
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
