Arkansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lemmonds v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 4:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lemmonds
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Robert S. Philpott v. Barack Obama, et al
as 2:2012cv02205
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Philpott
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Fort Smith Police Department
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Contech Construction Products Inc v. Department of Labor
as 4:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
Contech Construction Products Inc
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adams v. Robert Mueller
as 3:2012cv03028
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Robert Mueller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adams v. United States Department of LABOR/OSHA et al
as 3:2011cv03043
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of LABOR/OSHA and Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adams v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2011cv03020
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Chairman Stuart J. Ishimaru
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Adams et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2010cv03120
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams and Cherie L. Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas L. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adams et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2010cv03117
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams and Cherie Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Eric H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Deininger & Wingfield PA et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Deininger & Wingfield PA and Neil Deininger
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
OK Appraisal & Asmt v. Sandlin, et al
as 5:2005cv05069
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
