US District Court for the District of Minnesota Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Schindler v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
as 0:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Steven Schindler
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kato Engineering Inc. v. Verde Electric Corporation
as 0:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kato Engineering Inc.
Defendant:
Verde Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company as subrogee of Mound Evangelical Free Church et al v. ADT LLC of Delaware et al
as 0:2013cv01870
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company as subrogee of Mound Evangelical Free Church and Mound Evangelical Free Church
Defendant:
ADT LLC of Delaware and Tyco Fire Products, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. CNH America, LLC
as 0:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Doug Johnson and Bird Island Hawk-Creek Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
CNH America, LLC
New Hope Christian Life Center v. Grinnell Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
New Hope Christian Life Center
Defendant:
Grinnell Corporation , SimplexGrinnell LLP and Atkore International, Inc.
Brown v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
as 0:2012cv02817
Plaintiff:
John Brown
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Bethel v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
as 0:2012cv02728
Plaintiff:
Brian Bethel
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Joe Daniels Construction Co. Inc. v. The Wirth Companies
as 0:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniels Construction Co. Inc.
Defendant:
The Wirth Companies
Gibbs et al v. Uponor Corporation et al
as 0:2012cv02631
Plaintiff:
Charles Gibbs, Jamie Gibbs, William Connelly and others
Defendant:
Uponor Corporation, Uponor, Inc., Wirsbo Company and others
Kavianpour v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
as 0:2012cv02268
Plaintiff:
Masoud Kavianpour
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Jonathan Lebedoff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
