Minnesota Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 876
Larson et al v. Blosberg et al
as 0:2022cv02861
Plaintiff:
Michael Larson and Susan Larson
Defendant:
Dean Blosberg and Andrea Blosberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 0:2022cv02848
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, The Bank of New York, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Zins v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 0:2022cv02153
Plaintiff:
David Zins
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
PePe-Meeter v. United States Government et al
as 0:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Bella Jessie PePe-Meeter
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Minnesota, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lopez v. Park Tree Investments 20, LLC
as 0:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Alvina Alice Lopez
Defendant:
Park Tree Investments 20, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jenson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 0:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Richard Jenson and Nancy Jenson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Garry v. Findley
as 0:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A Garry and Kathleen A. Garry
Defendant:
Susan M Findley and Susan M. Findley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
v. Howmedica Osetonics et al
as 0:2022cv00515
Defendant:
Howmedica Osetonics, Stryker Corp. and Stryker Sales Corporation
Metzler v. Department of Agriculture et al
as 0:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Brian Metzler
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Cynthia Morales and others
Mayard v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Elsie Mayard
Defendant:
City of St. Paul, Paula Seeley and Thom Zangs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
