Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,755
Muhammad v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Aquil Muhammad
Respondent:
B Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Traylor v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Raymond Joseph Traylor, Sr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Del Real v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Miguel Eduardo Del Real
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Matthew Hernandez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wren v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
James David Wren
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Earl L. Ward
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston and Terry Kneisel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luque v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 0:2023cv03893
Petitioner:
Lauren Courtney Lugue and Lauren Courtney Luque
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison and Federal Correctional Institution Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. William Bolin
as 0:2023cv03875
Petitioner:
Carlos Kendall Duncan
Respondent:
William Bolin, Warden, Stillwater Correctional Facility and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03881
Petitioner:
Dequarn Markeyth Bell
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heil v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03845
Petitioner:
Tanner Jon Heil
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
