US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,667
Shunstrom v. Cordonnier et al
as 6:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Alison Y. Shunstrom
Defendant:
Michael J. Cordonnier and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cheatom v. Rockwell Security, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Davionne Cheatom
Defendant:
Rockwell Security, LLC, Cydni (LNU) and Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mattison v. Platte County R-3 School District et al
as 5:2024cv06052
Plaintiff:
Betsy Mattison
Defendant:
Platte County R-3 School District, Aaron Duff and Chris Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Meier v. Degase
as 6:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Aaron Meier
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Degase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brondel v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Brondel
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
