US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,412
Busby v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04028
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Busby
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Andrea Galbreath and Ike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Thompson
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Newman
Defendant:
Liz Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amlin v. Buckner
as 6:2024cv03051
Petitioner:
Qwenten D Amlin
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McIlvoy v. Centurion Medical, et al
as 2:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Terry L. McIlvoy
Defendant:
Centurion Medical and Dr. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoddard v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Melvin Stoddard
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Van Loo
as 5:2024cv06020
Petitioner:
Larry White
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooke v. Douglas County Sheriffs Department et al
as 6:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Duane Brooke
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Department and Christopher Degase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hostetter v. Ratliff
as 4:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
William H Hostetter
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Precythe et al
as 2:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gardner
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Brock Van Loo, Aaron Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
