Missouri Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,054
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Su v. Shamrock Concrete LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Shamrock Concrete LLC, Shamrock Contracting, LLC and Ryan P. Litchfield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nash et al v. DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Roderick Nash, Teresa Hill and Stephanie Turner
Defendant:
DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brito v. CJR Construction Group, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gildel Noel Ruiz Brito
Defendant:
CJR Construction Group, LLC and Centric Construction Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
**CASE OPENED IN ERROR. SEE CASE 24-00213-CV-W-SRB.**
as 4:2024cv00212
Defendant:
CJR Construction Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Swinson v. Hubbell Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
Hubbell Incorporated, Kristen Thomure, Jamie Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harrison v. Maid2Clean Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Harrison
Defendant:
Maid2Clean Services LLC and Elizabeth Evans
Richardson v. Maid2Clean Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Erica Richardson
Defendant:
Maid2Clean Services LLC and Elizabeth Evans
Chacon v. Alpha 1 Service, LLC
as 3:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Chacon
Defendant:
Alpha 1 Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Faries v. GILL GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Wesley Faries
Defendant:
GILL GROUP, INC., Samuel L Gill, Chad B Gill and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
