Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Trail v. Jeffreys
as 4:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Aubrey C. Trail
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galindo v. Jeffreys
as 4:2023cv03241
Petitioner:
Jorge Galindo
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Roy L. Ellis
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mata v. Wasmer et al
as 8:2020cv00487
Respondent:
Todd Wasmer and Douglas J. Peterson
Petitioner:
Raymond Mata
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vela v. Frakes
as 4:2018cv03046
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eric Vela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Torres v. Frakes
as 4:2017cv03078
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Marco E. Torres, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hessler v. Kenney
as 8:2014cv00357
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hessler
Respondent:
Michael L. Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03027
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Marco Enrique Torres, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hessler v. Houston
as 8:2012cv00427
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hessler
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunster v. Brittan
as 4:2010cv03006
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
