US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,224
Abdikarim v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Chief of Police Fargo, ND, Chief of Police West Fargo, ND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schutz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Kayla Marie Schutz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chris Baker
Defendant:
Christopher Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peach v. White Cloud et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
David Coty Peach
Defendant:
C.O. FNU White Cloud, C.O. FNU Herba and Sgt. FNU Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glaum v. Emerado, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Glaum
Defendant:
Emerado, City of and Police Officer Daniel J. Lund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
