North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,226
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glaum v. Emerado, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Glaum
Defendant:
Emerado, City of and Police Officer Daniel J. Lund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knorr v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gerald Knorr
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Fargo Police Department, Police Officer Toby Carlsson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etemad v. North Dakota Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Bejan David Etemad
Respondent:
North Dakota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Terrell Jason Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Counts v. USA
as 3:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Roger Ricky Counts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
