District Court Cases in North Dakota
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,614
Sanderson
as 3:2024cv00022
Not Yet Classified:
Bev Demers
Petitioner:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
WPX Energy Williston LLC
Defendant:
Gabriel Fettig, Howard Fettig, Charles Fettig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stanfield v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Stanfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fettig v. PetroShale (US), Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Fettig
Defendant:
PetroShale (US), Inc. and Uintah Engineering & Land Surveying
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Coykendall v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Coykendall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chris Baker
Defendant:
Christopher Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peach v. White Cloud et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
David Coty Peach
Defendant:
C.O. FNU White Cloud, C.O. FNU Herba and Sgt. FNU Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
